Can I Be Found Guilty For a Traffic Ticket Even If the Street Name Was Spelled Incorrectly?

The Belief That a Traffic Charge Will Be Tossed If Information Is Incorrectly Spelled Is a Myth. A Traffic Charge Will Be Thrown Out Only If the Incorrectly Spelled Information Could Mislead the Person Charged When Deciding to Either Fight the Charge or Fail to Appear at Risk of a Conviction In Absence.
A Helpful Guide to Understanding The Law Regarding Errors or Omissions On a Traffic TIcket:

Police Officer Making a Mistake While Issuing Traffic Ticket There is a common urban myth and belief that if a Certificate of Offence, colloquially referred to as a 'traffic ticket', is flawed, meaning imperfectly completed by the charging police officer, then the Court must quash (throw out) the charge.  This false presumption commonly circulates among the public and leads to many awkward situations where a charge survives and a conviction is registered despite an irregularity on the document.

The Provincial Offences Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.33 (the POA), being the statute that prescribes, among other things, the way certain charges, or offences, should be dealt with, contains the requirements that a 'traffic ticket' should be, "... complete and regular on its face ...", per s. 9.1(2) of the POA.  Where a flaw exists, s. 34 of the POA, generally, provides the authority for amendment of the flaw; however, this authority to amend is only available when the person charged with the offence, or an agent of that person such as a paralegal, is present and therefore is able to receive details of the amendment.  Accordingly, whereas if the person charged is absent and without a representative appearing, the Court is faced with the incapacity to amend the document.  Based on the perceived dilemma and improper presumption that if a charged person is absent and also without a representative appearing that the Court must quash the Certificate and thereby dismiss the proceeding, it is common that people charged with an offence will fail to appear in Court with the expectation that the matter will be quashed; however, this is a improper presumption.

Per the case of Chow v. York (Regional Municipality), 2018 ONCJ 818 at paragraph 10, a Certificate is considered "...  complete and regular ...", and therefore in compliance with s. 9.1(2) of the POA unless the flaw could mislead the defendant when making the decision to defend the charge or fail to appear on the charge and thereby risk being convicted ex parte (meaning in absence).  Specifically, the Court said:

[10]  A certificate is complete and regular despite omissions or errors that involve information that is not required to provide notice of the offence (surplusage) and could not mislead the defendant with respect to the choice as to whether to defend or default ...

In the Chow case, upon Appeal review, the Court deemed that where the police officer failed to check the AM/PM box so to indicate the complete time-of-day details, such was an insufficient flaw in that the person charged (Chow) would know whether the charge occurred during the day or at night and therefore the lack of this information upon the Certificate was insignificant and incapable of influencing the decision of whether to defend or default; and accordingly, the Certificate was unquashed and the previous ex parte conviction remained.

What Are Some Commonly Occuring Mistakes?

Some mistakes, as errors or omissions, occur more often than others, usually as an accidental mental slip by the charging officer.  Remember, for you a traffic ticket is likely an infrequent occurrence; however, an officer likely issues many traffic ticket charges each day and officers, being human, will make some mistakes.  The common mistakes are:

  • The name of the person charged is spelled incorrectly;
  • The license number of the person charged is incorrect;
  • The license plate number for the vehicle involved is wrong;
  • The address where the offence allegedly occurred is incorrect;
  • The date or time that the offence allegedly occurred is wrong;
  • The officer forgot to sign the traffic ticket;
  • The amount of the applicable fine is wrong; and
  • The offence charge is incorrectly shown.

Of the above listed common mistakes, most are amendable, meaning correctable; and accordingly, most are insufficient to automatically result in a traffic ticket getting quashed (thrown out or tossed).

Summary Comment

It is an urban myth that a traffic ticket must be quashed (thrown out) due to an error. Only when errors are very specific will a traffic ticket be quashed. Accordingly, relying on the urban myth that any error will result in a traffic ticket being thrown out is risky. Prior to assuming that a traffic ticket will be quashed, get legal advice from a professional by contacting DK Legal Practice to review and discuss your available options.

DK Legal Practice fights traffic ticket charges for clients located in Oakville, Mississauga, Toronto, Milton, Streetsville, among other places!

Do You Have a Case? Let's Get Started Today

ATTENTION: Do not send any confidential information through this website form.  Use this website form only for making an introduction.

For more information, fill out the form below to send a direct inquiry to DK Legal Practice

ATTENTION: Confidential details about your case must not be sent through this website.  Use of this website does not establish a legal-representative/client relationship.  Do not include confidential details about your case by email or phone.  Use this website only for an introduction with a DK Legal Practice representative.
DK Legal Practice

700 Dorval Drive, Suite 700
Oakville, Ontario,
L6K 3V3

P: (416) 906-6663
E: info@dklegalpractice.ca

Business Hours:

9:00AM – 5:00PM
9:00AM – 5:00PM
9:00AM – 5:00PM
9:00AM – 5:00PM
9:00AM – 5:00PM
Monday:
Tuesday:
Wednesday:
Thursday:
Friday:

By appointment only.  Please call for details.

Logo:DK Legal Practice
DK LEGAL PRACTICE

SSL Secured
Trust https://dklegalpractice.ca


Animated Spinner