Selling Haunted Houses Involves Concerns for Lawsuits Alleging Failure of Disclosure

Question: Is a seller legally required to disclose if a house is haunted?

Answer: While Canadian law doesn't explicitly mandate the disclosure of paranormal activity, sellers should be cautious. Typically, disclosure is required for latent defects that affect the safety or usability of a property as per McGrath v. MacLean et al., [1979 CanLII 1691]. To avoid potential legal pitfalls and stigmatizing the property, sellers are encouraged to provide full transparency during negotiations. For tailored legal guidance, DK Legal Practice is ready to assist.

Is the Seller of a House Required to Tell the Buyer That the House Is Haunted?

Although It Is Unlikely That a Seller Would Be Sued Subsequently Spreading Rumours That a House Was Haunted a Seller Can Best Avoid Hassles By Providing Full Disclosure to Buyer and Refraining Making Comments That May Stigmatize the Property.

Understanding the Law Regarding Disclosure Obligations When Selling a House Perceived As Haunted

In the case of 1784773 Ontario Inc. v K-W Labour Association et al, 2013 ONSC 5401, a seller was subsequently sued by the buyer when the seller spread rumours that the house was haunted and that such was a detail the seller failed to previously disclose to the buyer.  The buyer, concerned that rumours of the haunted status may cause a stigma with resulting harm in the form of reduced property values and the claim sought compensation for failing to disclosure the haunted status during the sales negotiations.

The Law

On the issue of proper disclosure within realty transactions, the law in Canada appears clear that the seller has a duty to disclose to the buyer any latent defects in the property that may pose a danger or make the house uninhabitable.  This rule was established by the Ontario Court of Appeal in the case of McGrath v. MacLean et al., 1979 CanLII 1691.

As for the concern involving failure to disclose that a house is haunted, the court in the 1784773 Ontario Inc. case determined that as the statements regarding the haunted status were made jokingly and the Plaintiff was without actual evidence to prove that the house was actually haunted, the case was dismissed.  Of course, it is interesting to wonder what the decision of the court would be if some evidence of paranormal activity was available.  Another interesting case involving a haunted house, was the Manitoba Free Press v. Nagy, [1907] S.C.R. 340, decision of the Supreme Court of Canada which involved allegations of negligence against a newspaper for publishing an article suggesting that a vacant house was haunted and thereby causing a reduction in the property value of the house.

Summary Comment

Although the likelihood of being sued for spreading rumours that a house is haunted is unlikely, sellers, among others, are best to avoid the risk of a legal hassle by providing full disclosure when selling a property. Subsequently, avoiding the spread of rumours about the property is wise.