Tortious Assault: The Threat or Fear of Imminent Harmful Contact | DK Legal Practice
Helpful?
Yes No Share to Facebook

Tortious Assault:

The Threat or Fear of Imminent Harmful Contact



Last Updated: June 11 2026

Question: How can a paralegal in Ontario help me fight a traffic ticket or provincial offence and potentially reduce fines or demerit points?

Answer: DK Legal Practice provides Ontario-wide Paralegal representation for traffic tickets and provincial offences, helping you understand your options, prepare strong disclosure and evidence requests, negotiate where appropriate, and pursue the best available outcome to reduce penalties and protect your record; call (416) 906-6663 to get a clear, fixed-fee quote and next-step plan.   You’ll get practical guidance, transparent pricing, and a fast start so you don’t miss deadlines or court requirements across Ontario.

Distinguishing the Tort of Assault from the Tort of Battery

Tortious assault is commonly confused with tortious battery.  The confusion appears to arise from similar misperception for assault in the criminal law context.  Tortious assault, like criminal assault, requires only a threat or fear of imminent harm by violence or undesired physical contact. It is tortious battery that involves actual violence or undesired physical contact.

The Law

The tort of assault was explained well in the case of Barker v. Barker, 2020 ONSC 3746, wherein it was stated:


[1194]  Turning to the tort of assault, the courts across Canada have embraced a common definition, as expounded upon by the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in McLean v McLean, 2019 SKCA 15, at paras 59-60:

Allen Linden and Bruce Feldthusen, in Canadian Tort Law, 10th ed (Toronto: LexisNexis, 2015) at 49, provide a definition of civil assault:

§2.42 Assault is the intentional creation of the apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact. The tort of assault furnishes protection for the interest in freedom from fear of being physically interfered with. Damages are recoverable by someone who is made apprehensive of immediate physical contact, even though that contact never actually occurs.

[1195]  To establish a claim for assault, the evidence must demonstrate that a Plaintiff had reasonable grounds to believe that they were in danger of violence from the tortfeasor: Bruce v Dyer, 1966 CanLII 191 (ON SC), [1966] 2 OR 705, at paras 10-12 (SC), aff’d 1967 CanLII 653 (ON CA), [1970] 1 OR 482 (CA).  As with battery, assault is a trespass to the person and is actionable without proof of quantifiable damages: see McLean, at para 63. In fact, even without a completed battery, if assault is established on the evidence it can potentially ground punitive damages as a means of signaling the need for public “condemnation and outrage”: Herman v Graves, 1998 ABQB 471, at para 52.

Interestingly, and unlike the tort of battery, as explained in Barker, the tort of assault arises without physical contact being made and requires only that a reasonable fear and apprehension of harmful physical contact exists; and accordingly, assault arises upon the fear of infliction of injury rather than an actual infliction of injury.

Claimable Damages

In a claim for tortious assault, a Plaintiff may claim actual damages for losses such as first aid expenses, medical costs, pharmaceuticals, among other out-of-pocket expenses, as well as lost income if time away from work occurred.  Additionally, a Plaintiff may claim general damages for pain, suffering, humiliation, anxiety including lingering fear, lifestyle impairment, among other issues.  In some circumstances, punitive damages may also be awarded. As was also explained in Barker above, an award of damages, including punitive damages, for the tort of assault may arise even where the victim of an assault suffers little, if any, injury whereas the civil law courts generally view that a damages award serves the societal purpose of denouncing aggressive abusive behaviour that may lead to violence.

Interestingly, in some circumstances, certain family members of an assault victim may also bring claims when adverse affects, such as lifestyle changes, even if temporary, occur as an indirect consequence of the harm suffered directly by the assault victim.

Conclusion

Assault involves conduct that raises a fear of imminent harm by physical conduct within another person.  If actual physical conduct occurs, then the assault escalates into battery.

At
Our Desk Now!
Need Help? Let's Get Started Today

NOTE: Do not send confidential information through the web form.  Use the web form only for your introduction.   Learn Why?
6

NOTE: A significant quantity of queries related to “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” frequently indicate a pressing requirement for competent legal assistance rather than a defined professional designation.  In Ontario, “licensed paralegals” are governed by the same Law Society that manages lawyers and are permitted to advocate for clients in specified litigation scenarios.  Core functions of this role include advocacy, legal assessment, and procedural expertise.  DK Legal Practice provides legal representation within its licensed scope, focusing on strategic positioning, evidentiary preparation, and compelling advocacy designed to secure efficient and advantageous outcomes for clients.

AR, BN, CA+|EN, DT, ES, FA, FR, GU, HE, HI
IT, KO, PA, PT, RU, TA, TL, UK, UR, VI, ZH
Send a Message to: DK Legal Practice

NOTE: Do not send confidential details about your case.  Using this website does not establish a legal-representative/client relationship.  Use the website for your introduction with DK Legal Practice. 
Privacy Policy & Cookies | Terms of Use Your IP Address is: 216.73.216.70
DK Legal Practice

2010 Winston Park Dr., Suite 200
Oakville, Ontario,
L6H 5R7

P: (416) 906-6663
E: info@dklegalpractice.ca

Business Hours:

09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
Monday:
Tuesday:
Wednesday:
Thursday:
Friday:

By appointment only.  Please call for details.







Assistive Controls:  |   |  A A A