Breach of Confidence: Improper Use of Business Information Including Trade Secrets - 2027 | DK Legal Practice
2027


Last Updated: , 72 days ago.

Question:How can a paralegal in Ontario help if someone misuses my confidential business recipe or proprietary process?

Answer:If someone misuses confidential business information like a recipe, proprietary software, or customized process in Ontario, DK Legal Practice can help you assess whether a breach of confidence claim may apply based on whether the information had the necessary quality of confidence, was communicated in confidence, and was unauthorizedly used to your detriment.  For guidance on next steps and evidence to gather (contracts, emails, disclosures, licensing terms, and proof of misuse), call (416) 906-6663 for a practical paralegal consult in Ontario.

Add this website to Google Preferred Sources


Misused Business Secrets

The success of a business may rely heavily upon secret recipes, proprietary software, unique systems, and customized processes; and accordingly, information relating to these key aspects may be highly valued with misuse of such confidential information quite harmful. In tort law, breach of confidence involves the wrongful use of information that was openly shared with the party that subsequently misuses the secretive information; and in this respect, breach of confidence differs from theft of trade secrets which would involve an element of misappropriation.

Note: For immediate help, please contact DK Legal Practice by phone at: (416) 906-6663 to retain services or to discuss any specific questions that you may have.

The Law

As per the case of Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574, a Supreme Court decision, the elements that must be proven within a breach of confidence case are:

  • The information conveyed was confidential;
  • The information was communicated in confidence; and
  • The information was misused by the party to whom it was communicated.

Specifically, per Lac Minerals Ltd., the Supreme Court said:


I can deal quite briefly with the breach of confidence issue.  I have already indicated that Lac breached a duty of confidence owed to Corona.  The test for whether there has been a breach of confidence is not seriously disputed by the parties.  It consists in establishing three elements:  that the information conveyed was confidential, that it was communicated in confidence, and that it was misused by the party to whom it was communicated.  In Coco v. A. N. Clark (Engineers) Ltd., [1969] R.P.C. 41 (Ch.), Megarry J.  (as he then was) put it as follows at p. 47:

In my judgment, three elements are normally required if, apart from contract, a case of breach of confidence is to succeed.  First, the information itself, in the words of Lord Greene, M.R. in the Saltman case on page 215, must "have the necessary quality of confidence about it."  Secondly, that information must have been imparted in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence.  Thirdly, there must be an unauthorized use of that information to the detriment of the party communicating it . .  .

As a particularly interesting example case, Cadbury Schweppes Inc. v. FBI Foods Ltd., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 142 involved the licensing of the recipe for Clamato juice by Duffy-Mott (a company later acquired by Cadbury Schweppes Inc.) to Caesar Canning who then contracted production to FBI Foods Ltd.  After Cadbury Schweppes acquired Duffy-Mott, Caesar Canning was notified of termination of the licensing agreement; however, FBI, who later acquired assets of Caesar Canning, made use of the recipe despite a lack of authorization to do so.

Conclusion

Improper use of secretive information may constitute as the tort of breach of confidence where information was confidential, information was communicated within a confidential context, and the information was then misused by the party that received the communication.

At
Our Desk Now!
Need Help? Let's Get Started Today

NOTE: Do not send confidential information through the web form.  Use the web form only for your introduction.   Learn Why?
5

NOTE: A significant quantity of inquiries related to “lawyers in my vicinity” or “top lawyer in” commonly indicate a desire for prompt and proficient legal assistance rather than a particular designation.  In Ontario, licensed paralegals are governed by the same Law Society that regulates lawyers and are permitted to represent clients in specified litigation matters.  Skills in advocacy, legal reasoning, and procedural expertise are fundamental to this function.  DK Legal Practice provides legal representation within its licensed parameters, focusing on strategic positioning, evidential groundwork, and persuasive advocacy aimed at securing efficient and advantageous outcomes for clients.

AR, BN, CA+|EN, DT, ES, FA, FR, GU, HE, HI
IT, KO, PA, PT, RU, TA, TL, UK, UR, VI, ZH
Send a Message to: DK Legal Practice

NOTE: Do not send confidential details about your case.  Using this website does not establish a legal-representative/client relationship.  Use the website for your introduction with DK Legal Practice. 
Privacy Policy & Cookies | Terms of Use Your IP Address is: 216.73.217.115
DK Legal Practice

2010 Winston Park Dr., Suite 200
Oakville, Ontario,
L6H 5R7

P: (416) 906-6663
E: info@dklegalpractice.ca

Business Hours:

09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
Monday:
Tuesday:
Wednesday:
Thursday:
Friday:

By appointment only.  Please call for details.

Application Hosted on Microsoft Azure Cloud Web Servers | Analytics by Google
Let’s Encrypt SSL certificate is a service provided by the Internet Security Research Group (ISRG)
All names, trademarks and/or logos are those of their respective owners.

This webpage was served on: November 03 2026 at 08:11:38AM Eastern.

.







Assistive Controls:  |   |  A A A